Are meta-analyses worth the hassle? TL;DR: It depends
- Date: Feb 20, 2024
- Time: 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM (Local Time Germany)
- Speaker: Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
- Evolutionary Biology, Universität Bielefeld
- Location: MPI BI Seewiesen
- Room: HYBRID presentation! MPI BI Seewiesen, Haus 4, Seminarraum 4/0.07 und 4/0.08, https://gwdg.zoom.us/j/84472240120?pwd=WGVXUEoxMlZOUnZjMkpUcE5yVCsvZz09 Meeting-ID: 844 7224 0120 Kenncode: 185545
- Host: Clemens Küpper
- Contact: clemens.kuepper@bi.mpi.de
With an ever-growing number of scientific
articles published each year, evidence syntheses, especially meta-analyses, are
becoming essential to understand and summarize scientific development, and thus,
to inform future research and policies. However, meta-analyses rarely
constitute the endpoints of scientific debates and in fact, most meta-analyses
are of low quality and poorly interpreted. Drawing from my own ecological and
evolutionary biology meta-analyses, in this talk, I plan to provide a general
introduction to meta-analysis with a special focus on how to read and interpret
meta-analyses, and most importantly how to identify the good, the bad, and the
ugly.